Sports drinks have 'no proven benefits' and their promotion by celebrities should be banned, say doctors
- Study: The health benefits of popular rehydration drinks remain unproven
- Specialist sports drinks offer little benefit over plain water for those exercising for 90 minutes or less, doctors say
- Celebrity promotion misleads fans into thinking drinks are good for health
Sports
drinks are useless for the majority of people and their use by
celebrities simply misleads the public into thinking they work, experts
have warned.
A
host of world class sportsmen, including Real Madrid's Gareth Bale, or
golf champion Tiger Woods have had sponsorship deals with sport drink
manufacturers.
Although
they are not as deadly as tobacco, researchers said fans and spectators
may be misled into thinking these products boost sporting prowess and
are good for health.
Real
Madrid's Gareth Bale (left) currently has a sponsorship deal with
Lucozade Sport, while golf champion Tiger Woods, (right) endorsed
Gatorade until 2010
But Australian researchers said any health benefits claimed by rehydration drinks remain unproven.
Writing
in the British Medical Journal, they said: 'Such sponsorship could
mislead the public into thinking these products work well and/or are
good for health—for which there is no strong scientific evidence.'
Previous
research, published in BMJ Open, found a 'striking lack of evidence' to
support claims about improved performance and recovery for many sports
products like drinks.
Experts
advise that specialist sports drinks offered little benefit over plain
water if you are exercising for 90 minutes or less.
At
this level, the main concern is to replace fluid lost through sweat to
avoid dehydration, and water does the job perfectly well.
Writing
in the BMJ, Simon Outram and Bob Stewart of the Institute of Sport,
Exercise, and Active Living, in Melbourne, Australia, said: 'Successful
sponsorship campaigns remove or minimise any scepticism about the
product, a common reaction to advertising.
'A
form of seamless or hidden product association is created whereby such
products come to be seen as integral to sport - the sports supplement or
sports drink.'
Celebrity endorsement helps to promote that idea, they said.
They
argued: 'It is for good reason that nutritional supplement and sports
drinks companies invest heavily in sports sponsorship.
Sports
drinks can contain up to 30g - or six cubes - of sugar. NHS guidelines
recommend 70g of added sugar for men and 50g for women a day
'Such
sponsorship - together with associated product endorsements and
advertising - conveys the message that their products are integral to
sporting engagement and achievement.
'Sport
may have found itself lending unwarranted credibility to products which
would otherwise not necessarily be seen as beneficial for participation
in sports and exercise or as inherently healthy products.'
They
added: 'If sport authorities, teams, and sports personalities distanced
themselves from supplement and drinks company sponsorship, ways would
have to be found to cover the financial gap created.
'Lessons
can be learnt from the history of tobacco sponsorship and its gradual
restriction, which did not lead to the wholesale collapse of sport.'
The
World Anti-Doping Agency has also highlighted the potential inclusion
of undeclared and banned substances in these products as a result of
global differences in labelling and manufacture.
Gavin
Partington, director general, of the British Soft Drinks Association,
the national trade association representing producers and manufacturers
of soft drinks, said: 'This article in the BMJ merely reflects the
authors' opposition to advertising. Sports drinks are very popular and
there is a wide range of them available.'
He
added: 'Their formulation is based on the latest scientific evidence
and medical knowledge and all sports drinks carry nutritional
information on the label, including calorie content.'
No comments:
Post a Comment